<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Long-Winded Journal &#187; software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustinmarson.com/personal/journal/archives/tag/software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustinmarson.com/personal/journal</link>
	<description>by Dustin Marson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:07:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Fate Of Our Applications</title>
		<link>http://www.dustinmarson.com/personal/journal/archives/2005/04/24/the-fate-of-our-applications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dustinmarson.com/personal/journal/archives/2005/04/24/the-fate-of-our-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art &#038; Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macromedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustinmarson.com/personal/journal/2005/04/24/the-fate-of-our-applications/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After giving further thought to Adobe&#8217;s Macromedia buyout, there are a number of things that really worry me, in addition to the things that excite me about this deal.  As I mentioned earlier this past week, I&#8217;m excited that we&#8217;ll most likely see Adobe products become more interactive and developer driven.  Also, we&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After giving further thought to Adobe&#8217;s <a href="http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,67259,00.html?tw=rss.TOP" target="_blank">Macromedia buyout</a>, there are a number of things that really worry me, in addition to the things that excite me about this deal.  As I mentioned earlier this past week, I&#8217;m excited that we&#8217;ll most likely see Adobe products become more interactive and developer driven.  Also, we&#8217;ll no longer have to deal with Macromedia&#8217;s tedious interfaces.  But I wonder &#8211; will the applications I currently prefer and rely on still be around after the acquisition closes and for how long?  Which applications will replace which?  They certainly won&#8217;t keep two competing applications within the same company, they&#8217;ll either combine what they want or completely dump what they don&#8217;t need.  These are important questions, and I have my own predictions:</p>
<p><strong>Adobe Photoshop vs. Macromedia Fireworks</strong> is a fairly obvious one.  Photoshop is hugely popular, and much further along than Fireworks.  The only thing that I can really think of is that Adobe should be able to grab a few nice features from Fireworks, especially for it&#8217;s ImageReady application.  In fact, they could probably just get rid of ImageReady, and replace it entirely with Fireworks with just more of a Photoshop look and feel.</p>
<p><strong>Adobe Illustrator vs. Macromedia Freehand</strong> is also a pretty easy one to call, Illustrator is as huge as Photoshop and is a much better program than Freehand.  In fact, I can&#8217;t personally think of too many things that Adobe can really take from Freehand, as Adobe already does everything better in their own vector-based application.  The best thing they can do is to integrate Flash into Illustrator, which is something I&#8217;m extremely excited about.</p>
<p><strong>Adobe GoLive vs. Macromedia Dreamweaver </strong>is the one that worries me the most, and I think it&#8217;s also the toughest one to call.  Adobe seems to be pretty proud of their GoLive application, they always have been, and no one knows why.  Hopefully, Adobe will be smart and recognize the larger market share of Dreamweaver in addition to realizing how much more powerful a tool it is for Web developers.  </p>
<p><strong>Adobe After Effects vs. Macromedia Director</strong> is another one than concerns me, because I personally prefer Director over After Effects.  However, I know that After Effects has more market share and they are more likely to dump Director.  Hopefully they&#8217;ll combine some of my favorite functions or take some things from Director, so that the transition isn&#8217;t quite so hard on long-time Director fans like myself.  Ultimately, I&#8217;m really going to hate to see Director go.</p>
<p>We all know Flash is going to stay, we&#8217;ll just have to get used to calling it &#8220;Adobe Flash.&#8221;  So at least that one small part of Macromedia is sure to continue into the future.  But I&#8217;m concerned about all the smaller Macromedia developments that have come up through the past couple years&#8211;Flex, Breeze, Contribute, FlashPaper, what&#8217;s going to happen to all these little gems?</p>
<p>Historically Adobe&#8217;s focus has been on graphic designers, and I have to wonder how good of a job Adobe will do in keeping Macromedia&#8217;s strong developer base. Graphic designers have a much different set of requirements than developers, and Macromedia has tried to capture more developers and has been successful.  This is the one thing that Adobe can either help or ruin.</p>
<p>As I said before, it will be a shame to see less competition in the industry.  The new Adobe will kill companies like <a href="http://www.corel.com/" target="_blank">Corel</a>.  If that happens, I&#8217;ll be really ticked, as Corel Draw 8 was the first graphics program I learned how to design on.  It has sentimental value, I guess.  On the bright side, the Adobe-Macromedia merging of software should really streamline things for those of us who have been using both Macromedia and Adobe products over the years. I&#8217;m sure there will be things we&#8217;ll all hate and have to learn to deal with, but there are going to be things that will be so cool that we&#8217;ll forget about all the stuff that we miss.</p>
<p>To be honest, I sort of wish that Adobe would have bought Quark instead, ending that dinosaur we all know and hate &#8211; QuarkXPress.  Eh, QuarkXPress 6.5 isn&#8217;t so bad.  It&#8217;s a little better.  It&#8217;s still pretty tedious compared to InDesign.  I suppose we&#8217;ll just have to wait for Adobe to kill off Quark the hard way.  InDesign 2.0 and CS have made some huge blows to Quark so far.  Will CS2 finish this fight off once and for all?  You all know who I&#8217;m rooting for.</p>
<p><strong>Personally </strong>not much is going on right now.  I&#8217;ve had a really quiet weekend.  Relaxing, but kind of boring.  I&#8217;m taking Friday afternoon off this week to get my Minnesota Drivers License and register my car in Minnesota.  Yeah, I&#8217;ve been kind of putting that off.  My ND tabs expire at the end of the month, so I definitely need to get it done on Friday.  And my auto insurance company is dropping me at the end of May.  Apparently they aren&#8217;t licensed to insure in Minnesota.  So I&#8217;m going to have to find a new insurance company, and the rates I&#8217;ve been finding so far haven&#8217;t been pretty.  Good thing I got a raise last week.</p>
<p>Not much else going on in my world for now.  May will be a good month. Big Cinco De Mayo party coming up, that should be fun.  Oh, and next Sunday my favorite show, <a href="http://www.familyguy.com/" target="_blank">Family Guy</a>, is making it&#8217;s big return from being cancelled for a couple years.  And of course <a href="http://www.starwars.com/" target="_blank">Episode III</a> on the 19th is another long awaited premiere.  Lots of big new music albums coming out, too.  But for now I gotta get out of here and eat something, so I&#8217;ll see you next time.</p>
<hr/>Copyright &copy; 2010 <strong><a href="http://www.dustinmarson.com/personal/journal">The Long-Winded Journal</a></strong>. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement.  Please contact info@dustinmarson.com so we can take legal action immediately.<br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dustinmarson.com/personal/journal/archives/2005/04/24/the-fate-of-our-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
